Skip to content
Bhuvaneswaran Balasubramanian
Go back

AIDevCon 2026

I recently attended a two-day conference that covered everything from AI-powered coding tools to data governance. Here’s what stuck with me — cleaned up from my raw notes, but keeping the takeaways.

Day 1

Day 1

The Developer’s Job Is Changing. Fast.

Devin AI (by Cognition AI) and tools like Open Claw are pushing what AI assistants can do for developers. A new role is already emerging: Forward Deploy Engineers — people who work at the intersection of shipping AI products and solving customer problems on the ground.

But the more interesting conversation was about which skills are dying and which are becoming 10x more valuable.

Becoming obsolete:

Becoming 10x more valuable:

AI and the Law

The conversation around AI regulation is getting real. A few things came up:

From Generation to Judgment

The most thought-provoking session reframed where AI is heading:

Generation → Agents → Judgment

The argument: we’ve solved generation. Agents are being figured out. The real unlock is AI systems that can scale judgment — not just produce output, but evaluate it.

The practical advice: focus on non-functional requirements, prioritize truth, and build governance into the system from day one.

Day 2

AI Is the New Keyboard

The framing here was sharp: the shift isn’t about AI replacing developers. It’s about the nature of the work changing.

What “thinking properly” now means for a developer:

AI is a force multiplier. Solo developers are now building startup-scale systems. But that only works if you bring the right skills:

A few honest reminders from this session:

Data Management in the AI Era

Day 2

The data session reinforced something I’ve been thinking about in my own work:

Key market developments discussed:


My Takeaway

The thread running through both days was clear: AI doesn’t replace thinking. It raises the bar for it. The developers who thrive will be the ones who can specify clearly, design systems, exercise judgment, and stay accountable for the outcomes. The tools are getting better. The question is whether we are too.



Previous Post
Dhamma talk at Maha Bodhi Society
Next Post
Cross-Cultural Leadership for Global Business